Legislators Propose Transparency for WIAA

A proposed bill in the Wisconsin State Legislature seeks to apply the state’s public records and open meetings laws to the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association (WIAA), which oversees high school sports. Introduced by Rep. Cindi Duchow (R-Delafield) and Sen. Cory Tomczyk (R-Mosinee), the legislation aims to increase public access to the organization’s decision-making processes.

Bill Ties School District Membership to WIAA Compliance

The proposal would require any interscholastic athletic association, including the WIAA, to comply with Wisconsin’s transparency laws as a condition for school district membership. This would mandate public access to records and meetings, with exemptions to protect the privacy of student-athletes and referees.

WIAA Emphasizes Its Private Status

The WIAA, which manages competitions for over 500 public and private high schools, noted in a statement to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that it operates as a private, nonprofit organization without public funding. It argues that applying open records laws would align its operations with those of public entities, potentially affecting its independence.

Supporters Highlight Public Interest in WIAA Decisions

Advocates for the bill argue that the WIAA’s role in shaping policies for public and private schools warrants greater transparency. They emphasize that decisions impacting student-athletes and school districts should be open to public scrutiny to ensure accountability.

Previous Attempts Faced Challenges

Similar efforts to regulate the WIAA have been proposed before. In 2015, a bill introduced by Rep. John Nygren (R-Marinette) passed the Assembly but stalled in the Senate. Earlier, in 2009, then-Rep. Tony Staskunas (D-West Allis) raised concerns about the WIAA’s accountability, citing its significant influence over public schools despite its private structure.

Next Steps: Awaiting Co-Sponsorship and Governor’s Stance

The bill was discussed in the Assembly Education Committee on May 1, 2025. Its progression remains uncertain, and Governor Tony Evers has not yet indicated whether he would support or veto the measure.