The upcoming August 13 referendums in Wisconsin are stirring intense debate, with Democrats reportedly investing substantial resources to influence voters to reject the proposals. According to campaign finance reports, a shadowy group advocating for “no” votes has amassed $115,000, with some of this funding sourced from unions. 

The crux of the referendums is to determine whether the Wisconsin Legislature should have more control over the allocation of federal funds, including those related to COVID-19 relief. Currently, Governor Tony Evers has considerable authority over these funds, a power Republicans and fiscal conservatives argue has led to questionable spending. Examples cited include funding for a proposed public market in Dane County, a railroad museum in Green Bay, and various arts and sports facilities.

Critics argue that Evers’ spending decisions lack transparency and oversight. Republican State Senator Duey Stroebel pointed out to the Badger Institute that many of these projects are unrelated to pandemic relief, questioning their necessity and relevance. Additionally, the governor’s administration has reportedly failed to document the rationale behind these expenditures, further fueling concerns about unchecked executive power.

The proposed referendums aim to bring Wisconsin in line with most other states, which involve their legislatures in federal fund allocation. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, many states provide their legislatures with some level of input over such funding, thereby ensuring a broader representation of public interests in spending decisions.

Democrats, however, argue that additional legislative involvement could impede the state’s ability to respond swiftly in emergencies. They contend that the current system is designed to facilitate prompt action, a necessity highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these claims, opponents believe that the call for more oversight is justified to prevent misuse of funds and ensure a more balanced and prudent approach to spending.

The August 13 referendums present Wisconsin voters with a crucial choice: to either maintain the governor’s current level of control over federal funds or to increase legislative oversight by voting Yes, aligning the state with broader national practices.