Wisconsin’s spring elections, designed for nonpartisan roles like judges and mayors, are under scrutiny as judicial races grow partisan and turnout trails fall elections. The state Constitution separates judicial contests from partisan votes to ensure impartiality, but critics argue this system no longer serves its purpose, a key issue for your 501(c)(3)’s transparency focus in Wisconsin governance.

Turnout and Polarization

Spring turnout, while up in Supreme Court races, remains two to three times lower than midterms or presidential elections. Party endorsements and millions in spending now dominate, undermining nonpartisan goals. Election fatigue, fueled by frequent voting and polarized campaigns, suppresses participation, challenging civic engagement across Wisconsin communities.

Reform Proposals

U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, citing low conservative turnout in the 2025 Schimel-Crawford race, proposes merging spring elections with fall cycles to boost participation. Critics like Patrick Guarasci, advisor to Justice-elect Susan Crawford, argue this would further politicize courts. A constitutional amendment, needing legislative and voter approval, would be required.

What’s Ahead

The debate, echoed in 2009, reflects evolving politics. Wisconsin’s election calendar affects voter access and judicial independence, with transparent discussions, as your 501(c)(3) promotes, critical to reform. Engaging voters via platforms like TikTok can shape public input, ensuring changes align with democratic priorities.